Visual Studio

Welcome to the Visual Studio UserVoice site. Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of the Visual Studio suite of products. This site is for suggestions and ideas. If you need to file a bug, visit the Visual Studio Connect site: https://connect.microsoft.com/visualstudio.

To review the current UserVoice statuses and their definitions, please review our “What Does the Status of My Feedback Mean?” article.

We would also like to invite you to check out the Announcements section we have added to this site, where we will be posting special opportunities for you to participate in.

We look forward to hearing from you!

The Visual Studio Team
Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Property Initializer

    In addition to get{} / set {} it would be handy to have an init {} block on Properties

    e.g. The new [CallerMemberName] allows us to call the following without hard coding the proprety names:

    protected bool SetProperty<T>(ref T storage, T value, [CallerMemberName] String propertyName = null)
    protected bool ValidateField([CallerMemberName]string propertyName = null) ....
    etc.

    where ValidateField runs any validations that have been defined for a given field:
    eg. protected Dictionary<string, Action<string>> Validations = new Dictionary<string, Action<string>>();

    The only hassle is that the Validations need to be defined seperate to the Property and so require the property name to be…

    9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Add a "fluent" keyword to c#

      I write a lot of code like this:

      public MyClass DoSomthing()
      {
      // snip //
      return this;
      }

      For fluent style code (useful for Razor html helpers):

      @html.MyClass.Dosomthing().SomthingElse().etc();

      What I propose is a fluent keyword that can be used when defining the method, so the above method would become:

      public fluent DoSomthing()
      {
      // snip //
      }

      I believe this would be useful as a lot of the time our class definitions can be quite complex, imagine making an editor control, the class definition would be something like ‘MyEditor<TModel, TValue>’

      Replacing this sort of definition and removing the need for…

      9 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        1 comment  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • Generic pointers

        It would be great to have generic pointers within C#.

        It is quite painful to have the function written for double, byte...

        e.g.

        private Matrix<float> Cast( Matrix<byte> m) {//do the job}
        private Matrix<float> Cast( Matrix<int> m) {//do the job}
        ...

        instead of
        private unsafe Matrix<float> Cast<T>( Matrix<T> m)
        {
        T* mPtr = m.Ptr;

        //do the job
        }

        The CIL and thus CLR itself supports generic pointers. Why would not C# also ?

        9 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Allow fixed size arrays in safe context

          unsafe struct X
          {
          public int i1;
          fixed int a[4];
          public int i2;
          }
          The struct needs not to be marked unsafe since int[4] is nothing but a four anonymous ints **** out sequentially. They should be treated not as array, but like any ordinary ints with a non-standard names (a[1], a[3], a[a[a[3]]]).

          9 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            3 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • Inheritance from TreeNodeCollection

            It is impossible to inherit from TreeNodeCollection because it has only 1 constructor which is internal.
            I suggest to make a protected constructor in this class so it will be possible to inherit from it.

            9 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • Make BulkObservableCollection<T> public to the core .NET Framework

              Using WPF and ObservableCollection<T> has serious performance issues if you need to add large sets of collection items at once, which is well known today. Each updated item fires multiple events that have significants performance costs.

              There are hundreds, if not thousands, of custom implementations on the net to overcome this problem and that have their own, more or less adventurous, way of adding a new "AddRange()" method that does not fire all those events for each element but only once once at the end up the collection update.

              There is already an existing implementation written by Microsoft, the BulkObservableCollection<T>…

              9 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • WPF: Add the possibility to load a font from stream

                The idea it's to load in WPF a font from Internet, a stream.

                9 votes
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  I agree to the terms of service
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • Add support for <inheritdoc />

                  Please add native support to visual studio for inheritdoc. See sandcastle's implementation for reference.

                  http://tunnelvisionlabs.github.io/SHFB/docs-master/XMLCommentsGuide/html/86453FFB-B978-4A2A-9EB5-70E118CA8073.htm

                  9 votes
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    I agree to the terms of service
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    1 comment  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • 9 votes
                    Vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      I agree to the terms of service
                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                      0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    • C# Regex Literals - Seamless Regular Expression integration with .NET Framework and C# Language Grammar

                      Create a seamless integration of the .NET library code base and language grammar with regular expressions, through new methods signatures and the lexical definition of regex literals.

                      I want to able to write regex literals like:

                      /[a-z]/cim // standing for new Regex("a-z", RegexOptions.Compiled | RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Multiline)

                      I want to be able to write the following code:

                      Instead of: "some string".Split(new char[] { ' ', '*' })

                      It could be: "some string".Split(/[\s\*]/)

                      And the same could work for Replace(), IndexOf(), Substring() and so on.

                      Especially for replacing scenarios, a especial 'g' flag (or 'a') would mean global/all matches, for replacing…

                      8 votes
                      Vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        I agree to the terms of service
                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                        0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      • Provide non-default value initializatoin for arrays in C#

                        Can we please have the ability to assign a non-default(0) value to array elements in C#. When I look at the cost of array construction, I see varied results, sometimes it is comparable to the cost of a loop, 400,000 - 1,200,000 ticks for a 1024x1024 float array[,]. Other-times it seems to drop right down to about 2000 ticks. I can only explain this by the runtime either having knowledge about whether chunks of memory have already been set to zero, or else initialization is using memcpy or some such mechanism under the hood to set zero. I would guess…

                        8 votes
                        Vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          I agree to the terms of service
                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                          0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        • Add Visualizers which allow us to visualize list & dictionary data while debugging

                          Like Datatable in .Net Framework allows us to view data in the datatable, it should allow to view list data like datatable.

                          http://rapiddevbookcode.codeplex.com/releases/view/51056

                          8 votes
                          Vote
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            I agree to the terms of service
                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                            0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • Add a WITH Statement to C# like the one in Visual Basic

                            Add a WITH Statement to C# like the one in Visual Basic. For example:

                            with (object) {
                            .property1 = value1;
                            .property2 = value2;
                            }

                            8 votes
                            Vote
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              I agree to the terms of service
                              Signed in as (Sign out)
                              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                              0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                            • Debug Watches work for variables across closures and auto-enumerators

                              C# yield return and await keywords cause a lot of magic in the compiler, that defeats most useful debugging in that variables that appear in source code to be local variables in the method are not available (no doubt because they're not actually in the current stack frame due to all the compiler-generated types. Nevertheless, it makes debugging difficult.

                              8 votes
                              Vote
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                I agree to the terms of service
                                Signed in as (Sign out)
                                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                              • Add index to foreach statements

                                Add index to foreach statements so developers don't have to declare their own indexes to track counts.

                                8 votes
                                Vote
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  I agree to the terms of service
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                  3 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                • Visual studio 2012 Update 4 is not genrating a .mdf file nor .trx file for codedui test executions, it is difficult to track executions.

                                  After execution ( Like in VS2010) it should genertae a .trx or .mdf file in the TestResults folder whihc will be easier to track TestExecution Results.

                                  8 votes
                                  Vote
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    I agree to the terms of service
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                    0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  • Add tail call elimination to the C# compiler

                                    Sometimes algorithms can be expressed far more elegantly in a tail-recursive form. The problem with that is the memory footprint, and possibly overflowing the stack. Though the 64bit JIT'er may sometimes decide to optimise the tail call, there are no guarantees, leaving you with no choice than to re-write the algorithm, avoiding tail calls. Having the compiler eliminate tail calls would let developers express algorithms in different ways, which may be more suited for the problem, while also helping developers who are not aware that their tail recursive algorithms may be problematic.

                                    8 votes
                                    Vote
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      I agree to the terms of service
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                      0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    • In ModelMetada class in mvc2, if property is returning IEnumerable then there is no need to check for null.

                                      public virtual IEnumerable<ModelMetadata> Properties {
                                      get {
                                      if (_properties == null) {
                                      _properties = Provider.GetMetadataForProperties(Model, RealModelType);
                                      }
                                      return _properties;
                                      }
                                      }

                                      8 votes
                                      Vote
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        I agree to the terms of service
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                        1 comment  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                      • Integrate PHP language with PDO extension for MySQL.

                                        There should be ability to use the online powerful PHP functions inside any C# application, as PHP is nowadays is very advanced and reliable language for online processes (server side)... and let other functions (C# functions) to care about the offline properties (local side)...
                                        PHP Check for files online, get values, also in logging in/out for online applications, and sure the most important point in integrating PHP language inside C# applications is to have PDO extension to connect to the online MySQL databases and function with them.

                                        8 votes
                                        Vote
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          I agree to the terms of service
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                          0 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                        • Enum Type Inference

                                          Allow skipping the enum type qualifier when it can be inferred.

                                          Example:

                                          enum SelectKind
                                          {
                                          All,
                                          Single
                                          None,
                                          }

                                          public void Select(SelectKind kind)
                                          {
                                          switch(kind) {
                                          All: ....
                                          Single: ....
                                          }
                                          }

                                          Select(All);

                                          And privide an 'SelectKind.All and All is ambiguous' if there's some other symbol called All.

                                          8 votes
                                          Vote
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            I agree to the terms of service
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                            2 comments  ·  Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                          1 2 8 10 12 36 37
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base