Currently when you run a Schema Compare through the Database Tools in Visual Studio 2012 you have the option to Generate a SQL Script or Run the Updates against the Target Database Directly.

I propose an additional option, a Printable "Report View" that shows all the objects and the differences. This could be as simple as being able to print the grid (expanded) that is generated from within Visual Studio along with some basic statistics such as:
1) The number of Total Objects Compared
2) Number of Objects in Source that are not in Target
3) Number of Objects in Target that are not in Source
4) Number of Objects to be updated in the Target

I send Execution file of project includes the two programs.

About Calculator Program: Start debug then click on Calculator button then input First Number like 3 then OK then input Second Number like 2 then OK then input Operation like + then OK then show result sure it will be 5
This Program has 5 operations are: "+", "-", "*", "/" and "^",

About Data Levels Chance Programming program: you must start by branch_id=1,after first branch records finish you must continue by a fixed pattern of branch_id(2 then 3 then 4 .........etc),Price&Quantity of product must <>0, branch_id=INT(branch_id).
Best Regards
Ahmed Abdelrazek

The existing System.Resources.ResourceManager is based on .resx files built into a fallback assembly with multiple satellite assemblies. This model works fine for some situations but it is inappropriate for others. It is relatively easy to create custom resource managers but it is not simple to get an application to use the custom resource manager instead of the ResourceManager.

What is needed is an abstraction from the 'default' ResourceManager - a mechanism by which I can tell my application to use *my* resource manager instead of System.Resources.ResourceManager.

The solution should not be tied to a specific user interface technology. For example the ASP.NET Web Forms Resource Provider mechanism is designed to work with ASP.NET (Web Forms) only. The solution should work with ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET Web Forms, WPF, Silverlight, Windows Forms et al.

The solution should be suitable for use with (1) file based resource solutions (e.g. .resx, .xliff, .rc, .csv, .resw, .po), (2) database based resource solutions (e.g. ADO.NET, Entity Framework) and (3) service based resource solutions (e.g. WCF, Web API, Web Service, OData).

Ideally the existing Strongly Typed Resource Class (STRC) implementation would use this resource manager abstraction so that all of the existing code that is based on STRCs would be able to use the new solution.

I supervise a small group. So instead of having a meeting so that they can tell me what TFS tasks they are working on every day, it would be nice to be able to select different project members and see what tasks they have in their 'In Progress Work'. I would rather hold meetings that discuss 'what's next', and give the team members who are mature enough the freedom from micro-managing. But some need hand-holding and I need to monitor their progress and make sure they are keeping on track. Adding a task to the 'In progress work' doesn't seem to set the start date and using "completed work > 0" and "remaining work > 0" in a query doesn't quite cut it for the less mature team members. I think this feature will allow me to micro-manage those who need it, but not annoy those who don't need micro-managing. I think it will also be helpful for remote workers to quickly determine what they can 'take a task off of someone else's desk' if their assigned tasks are completed.

Access controls by "Sparse" Index - Even a Custom control with Index can not be accessed as: MyControl(x).Text or MyControl(x).Value

This was one of 2 major issues preventing me from porting VB 6 apps to .NET. The only implementation possible would require superfluous loops through the controls multiple times to mimic the behavior but at cost of performance. It wouldn't matter if the controls load in order, it only matters that I can access them in a specific order and that the index value can correspond to an object array indexed as well.

I had built a Wizard that built all my stored procs, all the forms, and the controls with all supporting code that was generic. 90% of a new application could be built in 5 minutes. In fact, with two steps, all I had to do was change the startup object and encrypt the server credentials in the registry, and the application was ready to run. Some customizations needed for longer forms, but, most were astheticly pleasing as is. I can not find a way to duplicate this since .Net came out. i.e.:

Using an array populated from getrows()

For x = 0 to ubound(oTables, 2)
Next 'x

Yet, access data and controls from the same loop.

Sample of controls:

lblData(0).Caption 'Maybe ID
txtData(1).Text 'Maybe FirstName
cmbData(2).Text 'Maybe EyeColor
chkData(3).Value 'Maybe Male/Female

Then I had a generic "SaveFormData" that was called to check if data had changed and call stored procedure to update or insert etc. depending on the state. Also a generic LoadFormData which would load data initially and at any time a change had occurred to which a refresh was required. All of this was packed nicely into a Wizard that would optionally build the procs for you in the database.

I'm considering learning Python because at least it doesn't punish it's loyal users. I had been purchasing MS Products religiously, but, I'm starting to see value in Open Source as I don't have to pay a fortune to get screwed. I stayed inside the box, not using 3rd party controls, wrote my own report engine, print preview, Windowing via SetParent since MDI wouldn't let me do what was needed, but, still inside the box.

If I've missed the boat somewhere, and you can help me get some of this functionality, you can reach me at ctruett3@hotmail.com

Not sure if this is "Debugger" or "IDE".
When debugging you can watch certain variables. The left column has the variable name and the next column shows the value. If the value is numeric (like int) then you have the option to show the value in "hexidecimal display". Similarly, if you hover over a variable, you see the value in decimal or hex depending on the setting.

I have 2 suggestions that would improve this function:
1) I would like it if we had the option to show BOTH the decimal AND hex value. This would simply add a column--one would show decimal and the other would show hex. The reason is that some variables make sense to view as hex, but most are better viewed as decimal. It is tedious to have to switch back and forth.

A possibly-easier-but-not-quite-as-good solution would be to specify which base to view on a per-variable basis. You would keep the same interface to specify the default base, but then you could override a particular variable's display. I'm not sure how this would work for the case where you hover over a variable to see its value.

2) Add binary display as an option. In keeping with #1, you would be able to show any combination of decimal, hex, and/or binary by adding/removing columns in the display.

I am extremely frustrated by your decision to disallow updates to work item types when using TFS2012 as a cloud-based service. The default transitions are unacceptable (e.g. tasks transition to 'Done' when a developer checks anything in against that work item) and yet I am unable to import changes that I make using the various tools available to non-cloud users. After using TFS 2010 with an in-house server, I thought it made sense to switch to a cloud-based version, but I am regretting that move now.
Unless you can suggest an acceptable work-around, we will only continue to use this product until we can find a competing product that doesn't tie our hands.