Log file should be created based upon server instead of machine group1 vote
User should able to configure task execution types Like parallel or sequential1 vote
It would be good if we have feature to can add description for a specific release template.1 vote
Passing variables to specific task is not straight forward. This require enhancement. It would be great if variables passed in tabular format1 vote
it would be great if we have a copy tasks with parameters\settings on that task to different sequences..I know we have a clone template option but if I want to copy the individual tasks to run in different places in a given definition or on to a different environment...1 vote
I prefer using the VS's Offline Help Viewer rather than online help because I am often disconnected. Unfortunately, there is no way to view offline help for the MVC classes.
Can you please make the MVC help content available for download and installation into the offline Help Viewer?3 votes
MTM-If you use the "Add Requirement" feature and pull in a requirement, there is no ability to create a test suite under that requirement. You can't import a nested hierarchy. If I create a manual test suite, then I can import requirements under that. We need the ability to import into nested suites so we can better organize our testing. For example, we may have a test suite for a piece of functionality, then a nested test suite for each product it applies to.1 vote
Previous to VS 2015 you could set the IDE to perform a GET when you open a solution. This is no longer available under source control options. It would be nice to have that feature back.3 votes
An operator where for multiple conditions on the same variable.
instead of writing
variable1 == "one" || variable1 == "two"
The same behaviour could be achieved by writing
variable1 == "one" ||| "two"
Both mean "variable1 equals one or two"
But the second syntax is more natural and shorter to write.1 vote
Support the Setup and Deployment tool you had in 2013 - Why is Flexera's software being forced on everyone?
Would it be possible for VS 2015 to load the Setup and Deployment projects developed in VS 2013?1 vote
IntelliTest is still using an old Z3 version. Z3 has had many improvements since then. Please update to the latest version in order to improve performance.6 votes
It is often necessary to delete generated testes from the g.cs files. I think this should be an easily available feature.
It should be accessible here:
* A button in the IntelliTest tool window that clears the g.cs file for the currently selected method.
* A button in the IntelliTest tool window that opens a dialog where the user can choose:
- delete tests from this method/class/project/solution
- delete files or just clear them (might be important for source control)
The same features should be available as context menu items in IntelliTest-related files.3 votes
Exceptions are not visible anymore in the Visual Studio 2015 IntelliSense list members dialog.
Please bring this back.
Visual Studio 2015:
D3DX was a great library that can speed up the development with it's awesome utilities :
- Mesh Simplifier
- Texture loading
Please make those available again.1 vote
How about adding a code.cs.test file with a code.cs file packaged the same way WPF package a *.xaml and *.xaml.cs file together?
That way your tests are close to the code, and you don't need to navigate to a seperate test project10 votes
I often have places in a program that I am debugging where I know that exceptions are going to take place. I would like to be able to break on all exceptions, and when one does occur that I know is ok to tell the debugger not to break, on that exception at that location in the program. I still want to break on all other time the exception occurs.
It sort of a funny type of break point with an automatic continue.1 vote
It would be cool if we can add qbasic programming in visual studio.
I like to have an option to create or program visualstyles for the taskbar using visual studio.3 votes
Often, when submitting a code review request the requested developers cannot immediately respond due to prior commitments. If the delay lasts more than a day or so, there is a real danger that the original request is lost in the noise.
Add functionality so that TFS will send out a reminder e.g.
"You were requested to perform a code review on mm/dd/yyyy. Please accept or decline this request as soon as practical>1 vote
- Don't see your idea?