Basic Refactoring Functionality needed
Right now when I want to make a section of code a method or make some simple refactoring, its not in the box. Rename is there, but its local to the page and doesn't go deep enough. The top 5-10 refactoring types should come in the box.
Merged from another idea: Improve the refactoring tools like code generation, rename, etc.
I suggest something like eclipse. Or just put ReSharp into VS in the next version :)
IN SHORT: Make us not rely on JetBrains ReSharper!
Wow, 317 votes for an idea that is so nebulous. Personally I'd just like more refactorings available in VS Express (it offers only two). I write code at home, too, y'see. I'd use SD which has lots of refactorings, but it also has various misfeatures that annoy me really bad.
How about an "extract common subexpression" feature which automatically identifies the common subexpressions and lets you pick one?
We agree that improved refactoring support would be a welcome productivity boost for Visual Studio! Though we only offer a handful of refactorings in Visual Studio 2010, we have partnered with DevExpress to offer a free refactoring tool, CodeRush Xpress, which greatly augments the set that is available for both C# and VB. You can download CodeRush Xpress at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/ee663901.
Additionally, if you haven't seen it yet, check out the Microsoft "Roslyn" CTP at http://msdn.microsoft.com/roslyn. While this CTP doesn't represent a specific committment to more refactoring features coming from Microsoft in Visual Studio, it does reveal the public API that we are planning to make it easy for VS extension writers to create new refactorings and quick fixes. See the following "how to" documents to see just how easy it will be to create new features with Roslyn.
Visual Studio Program Manager
I'm missing "introduce local" / "replace temp with query". This is probably the only field Eclipse beats VS.
I would love C++ refactoring.
François REMY commented
Even C# refactoring tools are not sufficient for me. Please have a look at Refactor! Pro and implements some of the most useful things. Or make an agreement with them to provide a simplified (free) version of Refactor! like you did for VS2005.
The configurator commented
This recommendation should have mentioned VB then...
If VB had the basic refactoring that C# has, all would be good. Thats what this recommendation is talking about. There is no extract as method in VB.
Improve code generation tool, based on convention:
1. If I write IFoo Visual Studio should hint "Create interface for IFoo" instead of "Create class for IFoo".
2. If I write this.foo = 123; Visual Studio should hint "Generate field stub for 'foo' in..." at first position instead of second.
The configurator commented
A lot of ReSharper users are woefully unaware of features built in to VS, like extract method, extract interface, reorder/remove parameters. Every single example given in this thread already exists in vanilla VS. Can you please post examples which _aren't_ already implemented, so they can be discussed?
I'd be happy with just "Extract as Method" and "Create interface from Class".
I don't think Microsoft can keep up with ReSharper, so I seee no point in having only 99 reasons to buy ReSharper rathern then 101 reasons.
Microsoft should just buy ReSharper from JetBrains and include all the functionality into VS... Problem solved :)