I suggest you ...

Versioning of Work Items

Work Items currently already have revisions saved and make them visible by looking at the history tab, however this should be a first class feature. Allow users to navigate back and forth in time, compare versions and most importantly, let work item template editors specify which attribute and state machine changes trigger a major (x.) or minor (.y) change. For example changes to the 'Description' field in our environment always causes a major change from e.g. 1.0 (or 1.1, 1.2 etc) to 2.0. Same goes for status state changes from 'In Review' to 'Released'.

296 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Visual Studio ALM TeamVisual Studio ALM Team shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Oğuz BayrakdarOğuz Bayrakdar shared a merged idea: Add requirement baselining  ·   · 
    benben shared a merged idea: work item can baseline  ·   · 
    André DiasAndré Dias shared a merged idea: Get Specific Work Item Version  ·   · 
    Visual Studio ALM TeamVisual Studio ALM Team shared a merged idea: Support for baselining work items  ·   · 

    7 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Jörg B.Jörg B. commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        @Eric: we basically do the same by now: create new, single Test Case copies for new 'versions' of them (each of these physical workitems undergoes a draft > review > release state machine transition) and what we also do is link them to a baseline work item (as we do a lot of Projects in parallel, each of them being at different states/milestones we can re-use these Test Case across multiple projects or, selectively create a new version dedicated for one (or more) other projects, and link these new versions/copies to those baselines).

        The Baseline workitems basically help us to allow users to have a clear, concise point of entry for a project and see what test cases are included in it. These baseline work items are also used as base for test planning and therefore test execution scope.

        So we don't copy Test Cases in bulk and thereby avoid unnecessary duplicates.

      • EricFieldsEricFields commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I'm not sure using the workitem-baseline extension would work when there are multiple testers. I assume that every change the testers make would update the same file. I would think maintaining this on the work item database would be a much better/safer solution.

        What we have done is we added an AssociatedReleases multi-select field to the TestCase work item. When the TestCase changes due to a new Release, we create a new TestCase and update AssociatedReleases with the new release. The previous TestCase contains the value of the old release along with other previous releases in which the TestCase hadn't changed. It would be great to hear more about others' solutions for this. It would be even better if Microsoft provided a good solution. I understand the current solution advised is to create a copy of ALL TestCase work items for one Release and use the new TestCase work items for the new release. It would be better from TestCase management and efficiency levels to only make copies of work items that actually changed vs making a copy of ALL TestCase work items.

      • Chris FChris F commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        +100 on having rich history and compare on Workitems to visually see how they changed over time. Especially useful for Test cases and Test Suites.

      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Would like to have a way to have rich views of the history of what a work item looked like over time, the work item form UI and fields changing values over time.

      • Samatha BernsSamatha Berns commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        We were just google searching for how to preserve workitems in the state they were in at release. We want to have something like branching and merging so we can diff changes in workitems (great way to generate release notes). It would also be nice to have something like an export to PDF and make read only.

      • Jörg B.Jörg B. commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Hey, I submitted that idea originally :) We're currently implementing a rather massive workaround (in terms of customization efforts) to enable a similar functionality for end users and we'll live fine with it for the years to come. Nevertheless, having that as native functionality would certainly be nice.

        What also should be added to the use case description above is the way links inbetween versioned work items are treated - are they automatically copied over if one end of the link is getting a new (major) version, or not. Should links get an indicator (e.g. 'Suspect') on such activities that responsibles for both end of the link can easily see whether something changed on the other end.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base