7 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Scott Bruno commented  ·  May 8, 2012 8:40 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I'll add a vote to this one. @Ben and others, try to remember that just because you might not use something doesn't mean no one else can or will benefit from it.

• anon commented  ·  November 7, 2011 4:47 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Yes, bring back inline assembly. The beauty of c++ is the ability to have full control.

• Roman commented  ·  September 18, 2011 3:10 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  But for C++ x64-projects inline asm needed 100%

• Roman commented  ·  September 18, 2011 3:09 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Good idea, for C# inline MSIL.

• tf commented  ·  September 18, 2011 2:05 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  And for VB and C#: Add inline MSIL possible.

• Roman commented  ·  September 2, 2011 8:43 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  In many cases I use inline asm,
  for example, for some functions performance

• Ben Voigt [Visual C++ MVP] commented  ·  August 29, 2011 10:18 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I would prefer to see better documentation, Intellisense, and debugger support for SIMD intrinsics. Seriously, what would you use inline asm for?