4 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Silvio Jeschofnik commented  ·  March 15, 2013 7:15 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Yes, this would be great and very very useful.

• Thaina commented  ·  March 13, 2013 1:29 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Propose syntax

  public static int SomeProperty[this SomeClass obj] { get {} set{} }
  public static int SomeIndexer[this SomeClass obj,int i] { get {} set{} }

  Yes, this can be used to make "Naming indexer"

• Anonymous commented  ·  January 28, 2013 12:44 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  It is would be really amazing feature. I hope, VS team will give in the up coming .Net framework.

• Carsten commented  ·  November 2, 2011 1:58 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Absolutely. I've suggested this lately to the VsNext team, and the response was very positive.

  As always has such stuff been, it's just syntactical sugar, like properties all in all are. Still:

  var c1 = (new[] { "foo", "bar" }).Count;

  but

  var c2 = someIEnumberable.ToList().Count();

  Even coders need some eye candy ;-) Thus, thumbs up thrice!