4 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Rickasaurus commented  ·  July 11, 2012 11:42 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This is a CLR feature request. You should move your votes over the .NET section.

• Anonymous commented  ·  March 3, 2012 11:04 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  +1 for options to automatically generate AVX2 as with the /arch:AVX flag, FMA, and vectorization.

• Anonymous commented  ·  November 22, 2011 1:28 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  It would be nice if VC++ would also support the upcoming AVX2 and provide us with options to automatically generate the int 256 version of AVX.

• AlvinStardust commented  ·  October 27, 2011 5:03 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  First thing would just put in 80 bit doubles - I mean, it's like the stone age having to write C++ DLLs so I can use basic maths functions with a decent level of precision. As I am having to use Wolfram Mathematica libraries for not particularly exotic math functions, any chance of Microsoft providing a decent library of math functions ?