Bring back Classic Visual Basic, an improved version of VB6
The silent majority of VB6 users did not ask for changes that came with .NET
We request Microsoft brings back classic Visual Basic as COM development is back with Windows 8.
David Platt wrote an excellent article about why classic VB still thrives:
VB 6.0 should have never been put out to pasture. I see it as the underlying language in lots of applications from accounting packages to point of sale systems, astronomy to music production. It's at the heart of a couple radio station automation programs, and is used even in the storage space rental industry!
But VB 6.0 needs to be ported cross-platform so it can live with Linux servers, Mac, etc.
Even at this late date I still write apps in VB 6.0 because it's a snap to prototype. I also like the "backwards design" that is, writing from the interface backwards. This is probably why VB 6.0 apps are so user friendly.
There a lot of votes for a "improved" version of VB6. Which I think won't happen. So why don't Microsoft release vb6 compiler source code as Open Source?
Then if a third party or company want to continue develop and maintain "vb6" they can.
Our voices are united and we unanimously wish the return of Visual Basic 6.0 to the market !
Dear Microsoft, we still love you, but when will you get the point regarding VB6:
Dear brothers of the programming community, for those who see this message, please vote here:
Please, Microsoft, post an answer to http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/3440221 .
Thank you! Markus Melk
Since Microsoft has abandoned your most successful development language vb6 decade. But a lot of the old professional programmers are still using vb6, Can Microsoft send VB6 as a gift to these old programmer? Perhaps these old programmers can make VB6 run on the Window8 and Windows Phones. .NET is really too slow and too complicated.
We have read all of the comments on this thread and I’d like to thank you for providing your constructive feedback on this issue. Instead of merely repeating our support and migration guidance that has been laid out on http://msdn.com/vbrun, I’d like to address some of your specific comments here.
To play back the feedback themes we’re hearing:
- VB6 is awesome
- VB6 needs to be brought forward and maintained: in a new release or OSS
VB6 was and still is without a doubt awesome. VB6 made developers incredibly productive building a breadth of applications and as a result we have a wealth of applications and passionate developers to this day in 2014. One way I see our mission in developer tools is to empower developers to solve problems. This includes both today’s problems AND the problems of tomorrow. VB6, as you all have stated repeatedly in this thread, is an excellent tool for solving the problems of its day. We also stand behind our decision starting in 2002 to meet the current demands of our developers and the industry with .NET. For the scenarios VB6 set out to do, we see VB6 being “complete”. We feel good about VB6 being able to continue maintaining their applications for the past 15 years. Current needs ranging from distributed applications and services, to web applications and services, to devices, to new architectures and languages, required fundamental changes to the whole stack. We looked at how we could accommodate these needs through incremental changes to VB6 while maintaining its essence, and that was not possible.
To address the modern needs we would need to go far beyond updating the language. We have to remember that VB6 is not just a language. VB6 is a language, a runtime, a platform library, a tool/IDE, and an ecosystem tightly packaged together in a way that made all of them work well together. We’ve worked with many customers on migration from VB6 to .NET and found that while yes, there are language changes, the dominating factor in migration difficulties isn’t the language differences. Even open sourcing the language/runtime wouldn’t solve the fact that VB6 was thought for a different set of problems, and the fact that its strength came from the end-to-end solution provided by all these five pieces working together. Take a change like 64bit, the complete runtime, tools and ecosystem chain would need to be retooled.
So, moving forward what can we do? Where we have been able to help move forward is in our stance around support and interoperability. The VB6 runtime it is still a component of the Windows operating system and is a component shipped in Windows 8.1. It will be supported at least through 2024. This ensures your apps and components continue to run as you incrementally move forward to .NET. The support policy is here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/ms788708. There are numerous interop strategies that we developed and evolved to enable incremental migration as you upgrade your skills, described here: http://msdn.com/vbrun.
In summary, VB6 was awesome. We agree. We don’t expect or demand anyone to throw away their code or rewrite from any of our technologies unless it makes business sense for them to do so. We have to innovate to enable our customers to innovate. It is not a viable option to create a next version of VB6. We stand by our decision to make VB.NET and the .NET Framework. We think they are awesome too. It is not feasible to open source VB6 tools chain and ecosystem. The VB6 runtime was last shipped in Windows 8.1 and will be supported for the lifetime of Windows 8.1. Support and interop are great tools to move forward incrementally.
I hope you feel we’ve listened to your feedback and that I’ve explained things well enough that you understand our decision.
Group Program Manager
Microsoft Visual Studio Cloud Tools
Dennis Johnson commented
Excellent find Anonymous (Sep 15 6:45)!
Now I want to see what they have to say about not being feasible to port to x64!!!
How about that, Mr Yuknewicz? "Take a change like 64bit, the complete runtime, tools and ecosystem chain would need to be retooled."
The 64 bit thing is a lie. They had it in 1998. Not for intel but that is a back end issue.
Microsoft Announces Availability of Visual Basic 6.0 and Visual C++ 6.0 For Alpha-Processor Native Application Development
Dec. 07, 1998
Software Developers Can Use the Popular Visual Studio Products to Develop Applications For the Most Powerful Systems Available Today
REDMOND, Wash., Dec. 7, 1998 — Microsoft Corp. today announced the immediate availability of versions of the Visual Basic® 6.0 Enterprise Edition and Visual C++® 6.0 Professional Edition development systems designed specifically to run on Compaq Computer Corp.'s 64-bit Alpha processors and the Microsoft® Windows NT® operating system. Developers currently using these popular development tools on x86 systems can easily target the Alpha platform with just a recompile. Combined with the 64-bit Platform SDK, Alpha-processor-based Microsoft Visual Studio® development system tools prepare developers for future 64-bit Windows NT-based systems.
@Anonymous who converted to C#: what do you call bad code writing?
As I see a lot of **** code from a lot of C# developers too.. and IMHO you'll have to do with the language you need to use for your work, and in the end it's the developer that writes the **** code, not the language.. Also, what IS 'good code writing', IMHO it's in the eye of the beholder.. What may be clear and clean to you, may be unreadable and messy to someoneelse.. Stuff like lamda expressions and generics can be great if used properly, but to me, a lot of people are just abusing them and with it creating a lot of unreadable code (remind you, a lambda expression is in reality nothing more than an 'unnamed' function, so why not use an actual named function so other developers know what it's meant to do, just to give you one example of how misused lamda expressions are)..
I'm not saying that you shouldn't use C# for new projects, far from it, but don't diss an old language because it doesn't contain the latest hip stuff and say it promotes bad code writing.. As I said, bad code writing is all up to the developer him/herself..
Here, I have to give the decision to Jeff. The average of three test runs on my computer resulted in the conclusion that, at least in this particular test, VB 6 is 83 percent faster than VB.NET. Not too bad!
Another interesting result was that building VB.NET as a "release" build rather than a "debug" build only gave a benefit of 5 percent. And running NGEN (Native Code Generator) against the VB.NET assembly didn't seem to improve the performance at all.
@Anonymous, please post a link to your .exe app or installer so we can look at your source code, Thanks!
I was hesitant but then I gave a go and converted by VB6 to C#. And slowly I started liking it. Now, after 6 months, I know I will never go back to VB6 and I should have switched long before. I have already converted 50k lines of code from VB6. Now I am more efficient and I am applying all modern programming methodologies. I guess VB6 encourages bad code writing. I suggest everbody to switch to C# now. Regards.
VB6 is awesome....
looking forward if VB6 will be raised again with new design
Patrick Carmody commented
VB6 was, overwhelmingly, the best interactive / incremental compiler ever.
I could write a routine, decide it did not work, replace it with Stop, run the application and , when it stopped, try out variations, new dim statements, look at the variables, introduce new ones and all without stopping or recompiling. I can then code incrementally and see the results at once.
VB.net (which is just a wrapper for some C variant) is a complex, compiled language.
This is exactly the kind of languages I learnt on in the 1970's - compile it, fix the statement exceptions – and now try to figure out why it does not work.
And all variables and routine names are massively overqualified – this is so the compiler (which is too stupid to figure it out) can be instructed exactly what’s going on.
The idea of programming languages was to write the program once, then run it on a variety of machines. But the same old language was too boring for the developers at Microsoft.
A massive step backward.
And the help system on vb.net is useless - if it were not for Google and the independent tech sites, the language would be simply unusable for anyone less than a post-grad in computer science.
It just is NOT TRUE that upgrading to 64 bit is an insuperable technical hurdle – like saying you cannot put a turbocharger on a mini. Truth is the Microsoft nerds are all fluent in c and believe everyone else ought to love it just like they do.
I’m seriously angry at having to redevelop for windows 9,
Microsoft should also offer music ruled 14 inch listing paper - it’s the same vintage.
Release a new VB6 version PLEASE !
Please go here and let xerocoder know we want a vb6 replacement from them:http://forum.xerocoder.com/index.php?topic=273.15
Dear, bring back VB6 would be fair. I'm sure if you could see what kind of apps I've performed recently you would rip off your hair.
Not only VB6 is simple to handle but also the resultant apps are faster than other else
Apps' language made with.
Ok, so today, i installed VS 2013 to build Win Phone Apps. Guess what, they removed the MessageBox.Show method. so it took me half and hour to figure out how to popup a simple msg for a Hello World demo. thats not all, VS version are tied to WP versions, so to build for WP 8 you will need VS 2012, and to Build for WP 8.1 you will need VS 2013. the whole dotnet has became a unmanageable, slow, confusing junk.
Malwarebytes Anti-Malware one of the most downloaded software on download.com is developed in VB6. It also uses code from vbAccelerator. It gets 100,000 per week on download.com alone, if we count other sources then it gets about Half a Million Downloads a Month or 6+ Millions downloads a Year.
this radio station www.saDanceRadio.com is automated with a program written in vb6, along with hundreds of others all over the world. In addition one of the top terrestrial radio station automation software running thousands of stations worldwide is also written in vb6
Absolutely, count me in
>> there was a crowd funding project to gather money for a replacement vb6, would you give to the fund?
Quick Question to those interested. If there was a crowd funding project to gather money for a replacement vb6, would you give to the fund? My idea would be to gather the money and then look at all the options /xerocoder/vbrichclient/...etc.. and the backers would vote which direction to go. Thoughts?
Coke almost went bankrupt with the New Coke. They brought back Classic Coke. New Coke is nowhere to be found anymore, and Coke (the company) is back reigning at the top, with Classic Coke being just Coke again.
Give the people what they want. Funny that VS20xx now uses Solution files that are never compatible from one version to the next and are never converted back right.
High level was what Bill Gates was all about : simple to use. MS is now operating on a trial-and-error basis, each attempt going worse than the previous. Instead of getting back on track, MS went in so far as to introduce legacy objects to make the new .NET bearable.
How long will this go on? Time to burn the house down and build back a product based on reason. Get off the cloud, business and programmers prefer to stand on firm ground.
Sten2005 - vote for VB6 programming commented
What do Microsoft think of Visual Basic programming ?
"VB6 was and still is without a doubt awesome" - Paul Yuknewicz,Microsoft - June 2014
Vote for an updated or open sourced VB6 programming language at:
Sten2005 - vote for VB6 programming commented
Don't forget you can vote for an updated or open sourced VB6 programming language at:
Support Visual Basic programming.