Under review by ALM Rangers.
449 votesunder review · 9 comments · Visual Studio » Team Foundation Server · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
1,538 votesunder review · 16 comments · Visual Studio » Team Foundation Server · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Build A succeeds -> Build B is triggered.
Personally I'd prefer to set this up in Build B to "watch" Build A then have Build A specify that Build B should be triggered.
I'm out of votes but this is an AWESOME idea!
5 votesMichael Paterson shared this idea and gave it 1 vote ·
745 votesMichael Paterson gave this 3 votes ·
I could get behind that one too.Michael Paterson shared this idea ·
@Derek That's the idea. As with a lot of software systems there are interfaces, adapters, etc in the public API. I don't think it would be such a big deal to expose a few interfaces to do this. That being said, I also don't think it would be a huge deal for some pieces of functionality to not be implemented across every SCM system. If Git doesn't have an answer to the shelving analogy then simply return false or something.