ITMAGEITMAGE

My feedback

  1. 1,424 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

      We work with a university system which has hundreds of thousands of students on Office 365. For the subset of those students in Computer Science related majors, it would be fantastic if they could easily use VSO with their O365 account. Unfortunately the current reality is that they can't unless they create a Microsoft Account, which is huge pain in the neck for both them as well as the instructors (creates confusion). So they either just don't use it, opt for something entirely different, or in some instances they will create a Microsoft Account often using a non-Microsoft service such as GMAIL. From my perspective I believe Microsoft is losing out on a potential huge user base, and doing so at a critical time in students' lives when they choose technologies to bring into the workplace.

      ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 
    • 14,507 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        631 comments  ·  Visual Studio » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

        "I believe surface will die soon"

        So my post is off topic, but I agree that if people's perceptions don't change, then the Surface RT (and Windows RT for that matter) might be relegated to history. It's a real shame too because it's actually a very good device (just like Zune was). If you just look at it's usability, I think it's ahead of other tablets. I mean from the perspective of the browsing experience alone, it's fantastic. Much more pleasurable (at least I think) than the iPad (which is also a good device - nothing wrong with it). The Surface RT can pretty much render any flash site (albeit with a config change), it has an integrated USB, SD card and display port, connected standby, good battery life, an integrated kickstand, far more gestures than other tablets,, yada yada ya. So what's the real issue? It's interesting to see people compare the SurfaceRT to the iPad. They say things like "Oh the SurfaceRT sucks because it doesn't run Windows apps". Oh? Does the iPad run OSX or Windows apps? No,,, but yet people like it. Or another favorite of mine: "Surface RT is overpriced" Hmm, okay the price is $499 w/o a kb, which might I add is the same price as the iPad w/o a kb. Then they say 'Well I can get a kb for my iPad at less than 1/2 the price of the Surface kb', Yup that's true, but no one is forcing you to buy the genuine Surface kb, so go ahead and pick a lesser expensive one if you like. Or this one: "The OS takes up too much space and so your not getting all of the advertised space" Yes it does take some space, but so what? And who cares? Other than filling it up with videos/music, is it really that big of a deal? Do people install so many apps that they actually fill up the available space? There is an SD card port which can be used to store stuff. "Oh it doesn't have enough apps in the app store". Now what does that even mean? Are people just counting apps to make their decision? Are the apps they want available? Is that the deal breaker? Anyway the whole thing is in my opinion almost purely perception and fashion (i.e Apple is fashionable, Microsoft is not). Not to mention that Microsoft's marketing really stinks, just look at the Surface commercials: A bunch of people flipping tablets? Come on. How about showing people in real situations using their tablets for play and work. Anyway I'm not saying SurfaceRT is perfect by any stretch of the imagination, it's not. But people seem to do unfair comparisons, and it's a pity because it's a really good device. I have a Surface RT and was considering whether a Pro would be a better fit for me, but I after some thought I realized that for what I do, RT is a better for me due to things like battery life, connected standby, weight, heat and such. Almost everything I want to do I can do (although better VPN support and the ability to use a USB GPS device would be nice),,, but anything more then a laptop is a better fit.

        ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

        @Stephen - "Abandonware..Linq To SQL"

        Hey Stephen just curious, where did you see that LINQ to SQL is dead? My understanding has been that Microsoft was putting more emphasis on the EF, is that you meant? In trying to better understand I found this link which speaks to L2S as of 4.0:

        http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/bb525059.aspx#Q3

        I do share the general frustration though that they do a cruddy job of promoting tech which we adopt. And their communication to us about these thing is usually either dead silence or some marketing babble.

        You know since Scott G. moved on to the Azure team things have been a bit wacky. Seems st yesterday when he was saying how important and critical SL was to the future of MSFT.

        ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

        You know every time I hear HTML version X is the future, or that we don't need 'non-standard' things, I just have to shake my head. How many times have people been saying this? Yes, HTML5 is (or will be at some point) perhaps the best cross platform option, IF (and this is a big IF) it can do what you want it to do, and do so without ridiculous insane amounts of workarounds. Point is that Silverlight is an excellent platform for development and should continue to be developed and available as an option. It solves a myriad of problems and does so in an easy to implement manner. Furthermore, if HTML5 doesn't do what we want now, should we just not do it? Should we wait until some committee or working group comes up with a finalized standard that everyone agrees with? And is most likely the least common denominator? Well to be blunt, my clients could care less what something is developed in so long as it: a) works, b) is on time, and c) is on budget. Silverlight fits the bill perfectly for many projects, and is truly an excellent platform. For those who do not agree, then perhaps you haven't really explored Silverlight in enough depth. It comes down to the best tool for the job. In some cases HTML and JS might fit the bill whereas in other cases we may need things like Flash or Silverlight. This whole conversation is the same as the debate over ActiveX. ActiveX was developed in a time to meet a specific need which wasn't readily available given the tools of the day. Years later people complained about ActiveX, but what should have been done? Again should the world have just waited until some standard materialized? Anyway I believe Silverlight is actually one of the very best creations to come out of Microsoft, or any organization for that matter (just like c# and the clr). Just because people are against 'plug-ins', doesn't mean it's bad technology or should not be used. Consider if every browser natively supported Silverlight, then what? Would people still object? I believe in Silverlight and would absolutely like to see Silverlight 6.

      • 13,330 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          1124 comments  ·  Visual Studio » User Interface  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

          Updated Status: 7/2/2013

          Thanks to everyone who voted and commented on this issue. Visual Studio 2013 has increased color and contrast use within the user interface while continuing to focus on giving the content you are creating and editing visual prominence. We’ve utilized the feedback you gave us to help refine our approach to color and contrast within three main areas: 1) we added color to icons and reduced line weights to improve icon scan-ability and to better communicate icon meaning and categorization; 2) we added line work and raised contrast levels to increase visual separation between screen regions; 3) we included a built-in “Blue” theme option at product first launch to better support user choice.

          In keeping with these three areas we have made many changes to the Visual Studio 2013 built-in themes. In high utilization and icon intensive areas of the product, such as common toolbar actions and…

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          You know I was just thinking about something. We've all been under the impression that Microsoft has changed the UI to be more inline with metro and such. However,,,, I wonder if there's another plan at work here. In not using the Windows themes, colors and icons, maybe they're trying to make VS more platform agnostic, which would mean this might be a step in making VS easier to port it to another OS. I'm probably way off base here, but hey who knows.

          Just thinking out loud.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          " should support the features of the given operating system. In other words - VS 2012 running on Windows 7 should support Aero and the other visual features"

          Absolutely agree.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          @Joel: I agree with you completely. The editor window is only a portion of what we do. For those who think color/3-d icons are unimportant, try developing a project with a solution consisting of a couple of dozen projects and thousands of nested files within. Now go and quickly pick out the file you're looking for when there are no clearly discernible icons/colors. Or perhaps try drilling down into the architecture explorer which is also washed out with windows running into one another (no clear border). These two examples demonstrate just portion of where the problem lies. However set all that aside for a moment, and consider those of us with vision problems such as floaters. These are spots and lines in the vision path which are sometimes quite prominent. So when one looks at a flat surface, or a surface w/o contrast/color (like a blue sky, white wall) these things are all over. Same happens when there is a lack of contrast and color on the screen - the floaters are everywhere. Same happens with grey text and light blue hyperlinks - no contrast. Very annoying. Or consider people with chronic dry eyes who may have trouble focusing on something when all the objects are pale, and colors washed out. Now consider people with both of these issues and maybe you will begin to realize the problem. Try wearing a pair of glasses with spots all over them, and this doesn't even compare in depth with some people who have extreme cases of floaters. This is a real issue many of us face each and every day. It totally sucks and makes you feel like a sack of beaten potatoes left out in the sun. VS2008 and 2010 were fine and worked well for us, but VS2012 makes programming a **** on earth for those with these vision issues. So if you like VS2012 as it is, then that's fine and more power to you. However consider those of us who truly have difficulty with it (whatever that difficulty may be). All anyone here is asking for, is what Microsoft has always been about: CHOICE. Give us an OPTION. This is a real accessibility issue and I think perhaps we need to raise it to Microsoft as one. If they won't listen to reason, maybe they will listen to accessibility complaints.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          Hey people, now Microsoft is screwing up the MSDN site as well by removing the CLASSIC view in favor of the 'grey theme'. I created a thread for this:

          http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/3483906-do-not-eliminate-the-classic-view-of-msdn

          Also you might want to post over here as well:

          http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/libraryfeedback/thread/bbfb492b-4c85-4e8d-ab44-423c4050089e

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          @anonymous " see the proliferation of Metro to MSDN and Blog content...., barely contrasting colors selected for text, confusing layouts... "

          Absolutely on the mark. Lately I've been finding it more tiresome to view areas of MSDN because of the all the grey text. It's like they either choose grey text on a white background or grey text on a grey background which is insanely hard on the eyes. If you look though, this seems to be a trend on the web as many other sites are going this way as well. For example, the other day I was working on an iOS project and reading (well trying to read) docs over at Apple's dev site, and it was all grey too. What the fascination is with grey and reduced color and contrast, I just don't know. Maybe their 'marketing' people think the screen looks less cluttered with grey text than black? Well,,, yeahhh,, duhhh, because it's ****** to actually see! This really needs to stop. These marketards are creating a disaster for us. We write code, we read lots of docs, we generate software, that's what we do! These sites and tools need to be geared towards OUR needs, and not make some blasted fashion statement. Anyway, I'm ranting and off topic now.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          Icons still suck and apparently Microsoft has no plans of addressing this, they wrote:

          "We currently have no plans to offer the old-style icons for Visual Studio 2012."
          "We believe this design consistency is important, and we expect the icon styles to become familiar and comfortable over time."

          So go here and tell them what you really think:

          http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/10/29/your-visual-studio-your-colors.aspx

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          @ Anon "Yeah, I know so keep using it - nobody is stopping you"

          The other problem is that to develop Win8, WP8 and 4.5 based apps we'll need to use this beast. So we're left with little choice.

          ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 
          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          There's a project over at codeplex called Visual Studio Icon Patcher

          http://vsip.codeplex.com/

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          Forgot to post an example of a site using grey text on a white background:

          http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa496123.aspx

          Very aggravating.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          Slightly off topic here, but has anyone noticed some Microsoft forums and MSDN sites are now starting to have this grey text on white backround (instead of black text on white)? They also have a lighter color blue for hyperlinks instead of the standard dark blue? It's like there's no contrast and the text blends into the background - it's one big eye strain. Seriously I was trying to get some work done and each time I encountered this I had a hard time reading it. What the heck is going on?

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          @Narbeh: Glad it works for you :-) For me unfortunately it doesn't work well with my eyes. The only way I can tolerate it is to turn off all the toolbars and windows, and just us the editor window. Sad because the vibrant colors and 3D-like icons of VS2010 kind of gave me inspiration. Using VS2010 is sort of like sitting in a datacenter with the lights off, and watching all the flashing lights of the machines. This has always lifted my spirits - strange but true. VS2012 evokes an entirely different feeling altogether.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…
          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          @Roland: A theme editor is not enough, the icons need to go, the spacing is all wrong, the font sizes are screwy etc. What we really need is a complete VS2010 theme option. But alas it seems Microsoft has decided we're unimportant and thinks it knows best.

          "pressure on Microsoft to fix this" - LOL, good one..." - yeah you're right I should know better, one can only hope,,, imagine that...

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          People let's keep up the pressure on Microsoft to fix this ****** UI and so go here and post, post, post!

          http://blogs.msdn.com/b/somasegar/archive/2012/08/15/visual-studio-2012-and-net-4-5-now-available.aspx

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          I haven't downloaded VS2012RTM yet, so did they change anything regarding the UI or is it still running a maximum suckage?

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          "the new outlook.com is similarly grey"

          I saw that as well and provided some feedback (like their going to listen right??) to them effectively telling them the lack of color and contrast issues make it unenjoyable to use. Just when Hotmail was starting to look pretty good, they launch the outlook.com UI. I think Microsoft is either going to win big time, or more likely, lose huge marketshare fast. Across the board the UIs are getting sucky. They oversimplified to the point of it being more effort to use. Now I'm just waiting for that 'DECLINED' email to pop up regarding the VS2010 theme request. I will be floored if they actually listened to us and provide the option for a full VS2010 theme. Imagine that...

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…
          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          @mrdev: Funny you should mention that. I was just writing that exact feedback to Microsoft about their new Outlook.com interface. It washes out and no distinction. Ridiculous that in 2012 we have to complain about such things. Where Microsoft's head is, is anyone's guess (well maybe not).

          @Richard: I agree the color scheme is dreadful. I'll bet they probably picked a 100 or so people who knew nothing about Visual Studio (you know so they wouldn't be "biased") and said: "Now tell me, what jumps out at you?....Oh the color, let's remove that... What else?.. Oh the borders, ok let's remove that too...Now what? Oh the icons, let's change those,,, now? The code? Ok that's what we wanted to hear". Of course that's insanity because you need to use the darn thing and know what you're doing, to provide any kind of useful input. But I would gamble that's probably what happened here. Some people were hired to "reimagine" the UI and they had to do something to show their value. Change for the sake of change,,, that's what this is. Stubborn, pig headedness.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          People: There's less than 800 votes on the VS2010 theme topic. Let's not give Microsoft any excuse to say that 'not enough people indicated they wanted a VS2010 theme', and so head over to this link and: a) Vote and b) Write something

          http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/2819619-leave-vs-2010-theme-and-the-theme-editor-extensio

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          Metro is ok on the phone and so far tolerable on the tablet (although personally I'm happy with Win7 on the tablet - i know i'm in the minority). But Metro on the desktop? I don't like it, I don't want it and will only use it to the extent needed to do my dev work. If it's there as an OPTIONAL desktop (sort of kinda like it is now - and I'm not happy with the way it is now either), then great. But what's happening is a clear shift away from the trad desktop. First we lose the start button, then search is tied to the Metro envt, then Aero disappears, and eventually we may not have a traditional desktop at all. Couple this with things like the apparent loss of focus on silverlight (which is an awesome platform and I don't care what anyone says otherwise) and the abolute ****** UI we're presented with now for VS2012, and the result = total suckage. But who knows, maybe the generation growing up now will like it, as they seem to spend endless hours on bs social networking sites, texting and not doing very much concrete work. So I don't like some of the directions they seem to be heading in. Microsoft needs to provide a good solution for tablets, build on WP7 (which I think has enormous potential), and double-down on the already fantastic work it's done with Win7 & 2K8R2, .Net, Silverlight, Azure, Office 365, dev tools like VS2012 and such.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          Been months now and still trying to force myself to get use to this grey depressing disaster called a UI, but still come to very same conclusion: it's just total suckage, no question about it. Increased productivity you claim? Well I'm just not seeing it and actually it's just the opposite. Take the error provider component, you know it's the red icon with the exclamation point. Now it's just some bland greyness.You know stop signs are red for a reason people, should we make them grey as well? Waht's up? Then I was looking for the radio button, that's the one with the circle and green dot in middle. Was it green? No dude it's grey like everything else in the toolbox. How about the datagrid we all know as having the yellow db icon? Guess what??? More abysmal grey. I have to say this UI is just killing me! It takes forever to pick thing out and now I have to actually focus to try to find it (which frustrates me to no end). Is this increased productivite? Oh wait you say, just look for it alphabetically. Well maybe you work that way but I don't, I need my colour. It takes me longer to read through it alphabetically and is serious a royal pain in neck. And don't get me started on the greyness of the solution explorer background and other major windows, as that sucks just as much if not more. White backgrounds work, grey doesn't. So I'll say it yet again: WE WANT THE OPTION OF A VS2010 THEME, PERIOD, END OF STORY.

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          People, in addition to commenting here make sure you go to this link and vote for a VS2010 theme option, else Microsoft might simply say 'Hey only 100 people voted so we're not adding it': https://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/2819619-leave-vs-2010-theme-and-the-theme-editor-extensio

          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

          In addition to the LIGHT and DARK themes, add a VS2010 UI theme so that we can get back to work.

        • 4,271 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            304 comments  ·  Visual Studio » User Interface  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

            Thanks to everyone who voted and commented on this issue. Visual Studio 2013 has added color in several broad reaching icon categories. We classified the icons we focused on into three sets: icons which represent common actions, icons which indicate code hierarchy, and icons that provide some kind of notification. By utilizing a systematic and broadly applicable approach to color use we are better able to effectively convey critical meaning or affiliation through color, to attract attention through color, and to improve scan-ability through color. This approach translates into color being applied to ~80% of standard toolbar and debug toolbar icons, ~75% of code hierarchy icons, and 100% of active notifications.

            Based upon the design goals outlined above and design decisions reflected in the existing scheme for each of the core icon sets we will continue to apply and extend our approach to icon colorization as we move forward. As…

            ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

            @ Dean J. "...told my colleagues to skip 12 when they asked if they should upgrade. "

            I've been telling that to lots of people including students who are new to it. And it's not just my personal bias, but rather from observation. Initially some students/teachers were considering it, but then after they took one look at the UI, they were like "Whaaaaat the ?!?!"

            It really is a bummer not to be able to reconfigure it to use the VS2010 icons, themes, borders etc. Yeah some people like it, but the vast majority of folks I've spoke with just don't. Mind you I also don't like the Adobe CS UI either.

            ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

            @Oliver "If you look at Adobe products like Photoshop or Illustrator those have the same approach with shady toolbars and icon"

            Yes,,, unfortunately for me they do, and ever since they changed to those flat colorless icons, I've not been a happy camper. For me vibrant colors, 3d effects, aero and such in the IDE spawns a bit of creativity.

            ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

            I'll tell you what I fail to understand and perhaps(hopefully) someone here can educate me, and that is: What is the deal with all the grey these days? It's not just Microsoft and VS but it seems to be occurring everywhere. Specifically I am referring to the grey text instead of black text on developer sites. For example, look at the lightweight view of MSDN, and now go check other dev sites and you'll see a pattern: grey everywhere. It's terribly hard to read docs when the contrast is so poor. Should be black text on a white background, don't you think? But it does seem that Microsoft is really pushing this crud contrast across everything: MSDN, VS, Outlook.com, Office365, TechNet forums, just all over the place. Also why reduce colored 3d-like icons to flat grey?

          • 244 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              20 comments  ·  Visual Studio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 
              ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

              Seems Microsoft has added a 'Related Resources' section to the lightweight view. I find this unhelpful and more a distraction than anything else. What do you think?

              ITMAGEITMAGE shared this idea  · 
            • 6 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                1 comment  ·  Visual Studio » IDE  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • 3,043 votes
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  I agree to the terms of service
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  112 comments  ·  Visual Studio » User Interface  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                  Thank you everyone for voting and commenting on this issue.
                  We are happy to share that we have made changes to the Menu Bar style in Visual Studio. In Visual Studio “14” CTP2 Menu Bar shows in Title Case and in Visual Studio 2013 Update 3 RC we have added a tools options control for you to pick Title Case styling or All Caps styling for the Menu Bar. Please refer to the following announcements for details –
                  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2014/07/08/visual-studio-14-ctp-2-available.aspx
                  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2014/07/02/update-3-release-candidate-for-visual-studio-2013.aspx
                  If you are using Visual Studio 2012, you can change the Menu Bar style using this regkey –
                  HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\11.0\General
                  DWORD: SuppressUppercaseConversion
                  Value: 1

                  Visual Studio UX Team
                  -————————————————————————

                  Thanks to everyone who voted and commented on this issue. Keeping with a Microsoft-wide emphasis on typography and casing as a key structure-defining element, we are retaining all caps casing as our default within the Visual Studio top level menu…

                  ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                  The option for Proper Case has already been completed - see here:

                  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/zainnab/archive/2012/06/14/turn-off-the-uppercase-menu-in-visual-studio-2012.aspx

                  So we got the the theme editor and the caps issue resolved. The next hurdle is to get the VS2010 icons back. It'd also be nice to get back the original VS2010 chrome and have it respect the Windows theme setting like Aero.

                  Tom

                  ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 
                • 1,397 votes
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    I agree to the terms of service
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    78 comments  ·  Visual Studio » User Interface  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…
                    ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                    "A theme editor would at least make the decisions forgivable" -- It would help but the other huge problem are the icons including those in the solution explorer. We need to be able to change them as well.

                    ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                    Colors(or lack thereof): Bad, Iconography: Bad, Contrast: Bad, Window separation: Bad

                    Trying to find something good (that I like) about the UI is posing quite a challenge.

                    ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…
                    ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 
                    ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                    @Anonymous: Well I can say we generally updgrade for one of two reasons: a) Added functionality such as support for newer frameworks, and b) Greater usability which includes things like theUI. At this time we're quite content with .Net 3.5 and VS2010 functionality, and so that leaves the usability, which sadly, VS2012RC lags behind in due to the horrid UI. In any event we're an enterprise organization and are starting to investigate alternative IDEs in the event Microsoft doesn't fix this mess and provide something like a VS2010 theme.

                  • 3,311 votes
                    Vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      I agree to the terms of service
                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                      200 comments  ·  Visual Studio » Compatibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                      Thanks to everyone for sharing your feedback on this issue. VS 2012 supported platforms are now published here (http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/11/en-us/products/compatibility ). While Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 are not supported for .NET Framework 4.5, they remain as supported targeted platforms in VS 2012. More information is available here (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/05/18/a-look-ahead-at-the-visual-studio-11-product-lineup-and-platform-support.aspx)

                      Thank you,
                      DeonHe – MSFT
                      .NET Framework Team

                      ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                      @shame: Totally bad decision.

                      @radioman: Total suckage.

                      @kostya: I hear ya, Maybe just stay with .Net 4.0 if that does the trick. So far we have no reason to move to 4.5 or VS2012 with it's dreary and blurry UI. Maybe that day will come, maybe not, but whatever 4.0 doesn't have we can probably augment in other ways. Problem for us though comes with developing for Win8 Metro and WP8 though.

                      ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                      Are they going to decline the VS2010 theme as well?!??

                      ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                      I agree, this is disappointing. And no explanation?? That's just a bit disrespectful to all those here who spent their time to comment.

                      ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 
                    • 420 votes
                      Vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        I agree to the terms of service
                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                        28 comments  ·  Visual Studio » User Interface  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 
                        ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                        Another thing I noticed but couldn't quantify until today is that the bowtie icon is kinda harsh with it's pointy edges. Sounds ridiculous but this concept extends to other Metro UI stuff as well such as removing the rounded edges on app windows, square tiles, lack of gradient/transition in color (it's like all or nothing) and so on. So rather than having rounded edges and smooth transitions in the UI which gives me a smooth calming feeling (as strange as it may sound), it makes me kind of agitated. Strange but true. But hey it just must be me getting old...

                        ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                        This new icon is pretty ugly, whereas the VS2010 infinity symbol represents the infinite possibilities when using VS. Ahh here's a nice slogan if we went back to the infinity symbol: 'Explore the infinite with Visual Studio 2012'

                      • 2,546 votes
                        Vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          I agree to the terms of service
                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                          70 comments  ·  Visual Studio » Languages - C++  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                          UPDATE: This SKU is now available for download – details here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/09/12/visual-studio-express-2012-for-windows-desktop-is-here.aspx

                          Thanks for all the feedback on this item. As you may have seen, we will plan to release a Visual Studio 2012 Express for Windows desktop this Fall. Full details are here:
                          http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2012/06/08/visual-studio-express-2012-for-windows-desktop.aspx

                          Thanks,
                          Doug Turnure – Visual Studio PM

                          PS – I’m going to go ahead and close this item out and release your UserVoice votes back so you can apply them elsewhere.

                          ITMAGEITMAGE commented  ·   ·  Delete…

                          By not allowing VS 2012 Express to target the non-metro UI, Microsoft will lose many of the very people their looking to gain: New developers on other platforms and startup software companies who have little money to purchase VS licenses. So these people will go with Monodevelop or something and start the trek down open source. Bad move Microsoft.

                          ITMAGEITMAGE supported this idea  · 

                        Feedback and Knowledge Base