Fix 260 character file name length limitation
The 260 character limit on file paths really gets in the way of having a deeply-nested project hierarchy. It's only there as backwards compatibility with the old school APIs, and has no place in any sort of modern development environment.
We should be able to work with file paths of whatever size we want.
Hello everyone and thank you for the feedback and for voting on this issue. We understand that this can be a frustrating issue, however, fixing it requires a large and complicated architectural change across different products and features including Visual Studio, TFS, MSBuild and the .NET Framework. Dedicating resources to this work item would come at the expense of many other features and innovation. Additionally, if we removed this limitation from our first party tools it will still likely exist elsewhere in Visual Studio’s ecosystem of extensions and tools. For these reasons, we are declining this suggestion and returning return everyone’s votes so they can be applied to other items. In the interest of delivering the most value to our customers we sometimes have to make very difficult cuts, and this is one of them.
Visual Studio – Project and Build Team
weird, I'm dealing with this now, trying to make it work on TFS Build Server.
I bookmarked this site.
I love it.
"Declined - Visual Studio UV Site Admin" 2013 -- Unbelievable answer!!
Currently, one of my tfvc 2013 repositories has several files with paths so long they don't show in any repository browser I use. I only see it in the errors that prevent building as a path too long error. This is unacceptable. Apparently you haven't found a way to deal with this internally, as my issue should never have been released with the TFVC product.
The VS product chain costs a lot of money and this issue has been around for a long time. As a release engineer I have to resolve this issue over and over again. I need improvements that make spending that money worthwhile.
Yes, well, I want to vote for this. Can you please re-open it or should we create a brand new suggestion?
Stijn Spijker commented
This needs to be fixed ASAP, as 255 characters is DOS era, and I'd like to think Microsoft has moved on since then.
It's really disappointing this issue being declined. You should at least consider providing an alternate mechanism that modern apps can invoke, and leave the old compatibility for older apps.
Matthew Kruluts commented
You mean to tell me that Microsoft doesn't implement best standards and have something like the maximum character limit set as a globally defined constant in your projects? Meaning, change it once and every where in the project it updates? I expected better from a company trying to enforce best practices on its users.
Seth Rudesill commented
Can this be fixed now please?
What a bad excuse… makes me cry.
Really wait for fixing it.
Long Wang commented
Well thats stupid, bye windows.
Ok. I've taken a deep breath. Commit the freaking resources! How hard can it be to increase the path length across a handful of products. Sigh.
William Bosacker commented
Now that .NET Core 1.0 supports path names up to 32,768 Unicode characters in length, when can we expect products to take advantage of the new frameworks?
Hung Nguyen commented
MS, this is really a stupid limitation of Windows in compared with Unix-based OS, you need to fix it, regardless how expensive / how difficult it is.
William Bosacker commented
FYI, the changes to .NET Core have been completed: https://gist.github.com/cartermp/e2950be56ef3341ade56
My best guess would be that it will take up to a year for this to propagate to all of Microsoft's products, and hopefully ALL versions of the .NET Framework. As stated in the proposal for this fix, making this change should have zero effect on existing code. Adding the code to the framework will just make everything silently "Work".
This only affects .NET applications, it does not affect C++ applications which have had this ability since 2002.
Very annoying, and even more when the path gets extended by Visual Studio itself! I end up with file test_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.dir\Debug\test_cpp.94C82ABC.tlog\test_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.lastbuildstate
not being created and then my build fails...
This is would be comical if I didn't need to use 3rd party package managers but because I do it's just extremely frustrating. Goodbye Visual Studio.
Remember that not long ago somebody said "nobody will ever need more than 640K ram"
Would you like to find your precious studio together with your ****** os in the pile of abandon-ware?
SUCK IT UP, FIX IT AND STOP WHINING ... YOU STUPID BI** !!!!!
Markus Engelhardt commented
Ok, now I am getting in this line too, we got the same error and it is really frustrating.
How am I supposed to build up a clean project structure, e.g. by naming sub projects according to their namespaces when I cannot even deploy an ASP.NET 5 REST Service to C:\tmp as my paths are too long then?
Keeping this bug (as I cannot see it as anything else) over multiple Visual Studio versions is really ignorant and I would also call it kind of stubborn.
Daniel Little commented
Still worth it!