I suggest you ...

Edit & Continue: Allow the modification of iterators

This has been split from https://visualstudio.uservoice.com/admin/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/2035769-make-edit-and-continue-work-more-globally.

Edit and Continue has always been a staple of Visual Studio development; it's one of the most important features that make it better than other IDEs. In 2002, Visual Studio .Net came out, and didn't have Edit and Continue, which made it very hard to use. In 2003, the new version had Edit and Continue and I was jubilant.

Enable edit and continue for iterator changes; that might mean that you even have to allow edit and continue to add new methods, but that should be possible using light-weight code generation

(Filed on behalf of "The Configurator": https://visualstudio.uservoice.com/admin/users/14358195-the-configurator)

8 votes
Vote
Sign in
(thinking…)
Password icon
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
AdminVisual Studio Team (Product Team, Microsoft Visual Studio) shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

Hi,

This suggestion is now complete!
Visual Studio supports this Edit and Continue feature starting with Visual Studio 2015 CTP 6: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2015/02/23/visual-studio-2015-ctp-6-and-team-foundation-server-2015-ctp-released.aspx

For more information, please, read: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/02/23/enc-improvements-for-net-debugging-in-visual-studio-2015.aspx

If you have any feedback or questions for us, please, reach out through:
Send-a-Smile (Visual Studio feedback tool)
https://twitter.com/VS_Debugger
vsdbgfb@microsoft.com
commenting on the blog post

If you would like to follow news about the Visual Studio Debugger, please subscribe to our blog or to our twitter account.

Thanks for sharing this suggestion with us and for using Visual Studio!
Maria Ghiondea
Visual Studio Diagnostics

1 comment

Sign in
(thinking…)
Password icon
Signed in as (Sign out)
Submitting...
  • blog.nerdbank.net commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    I'm voting for this because I believe it would be a prerequisite for allowing modification of async methods, which is what I'd really like.

Feedback and Knowledge Base