# Visual Studio IDE

Welcome to the Visual Studio UserVoice site. Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of the Visual Studio suite of products. This site is for suggestions and ideas. If you need to file a bug, you can visit our Developer Community website to get started.

NOTE: The Applications Insights forum has moved to the Azure feedback site.

For suggestions for improvements to other developer products, see these sites:

To review the current UserVoice statuses and their definitions, please review our “What Does the Status of My Feedback Mean?” article.

We look forward to hearing from you!

- The Visual Studio Team

## I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

### There are two ways to get more votes:

• When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
• You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
• To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

• Hot ideas
• Top ideas
• New ideas
• My feedback
1. ## Add a 'Set All' button to the font size selector

I know most developers have good eyes, so the few that cannot see properly are not important enough to have Microsoft care about the fact we can't use the IDE 'Out of the box'.

I cannot read any Visual Studio menu options until I get all fonts set to Verdana Size 14.

Doing this takes a long time, and when I sign in on a new machine you do not always import the settings.

Or, tell me how to programmatically set the values, and I will write an extension, but as it is, I can't use visual studio to import…

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Only show links to solutions on Visual Studio Start Page, no links project

About 99% of the time, I open solutions from the Visual Studio Start Page. Somehow, also projects are listed. I do not need them. Please make it option, if they are shown or not. This way I do not have to delete the projects links be hand. Thankx for considering.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## There should again be a function to simply sort the "usings" without deleting the unused ones.

There should again be a function to simply sort the "usings" without deleting the unused ones.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## replace VS studio wb (crtl+alt+r) with edge

replace the visual studio 2017 web browser (crtl+alt+r - not the control in toolbox) with edge possibly make it dock able within like the current one is. :)

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Instead of asking me to install missing Windows SDK version, also offer me upgrade project to an installed SDK

If I open a UWP project that references 10240 SDK, but I don't have that installed, i'm presented with two options: Install the SDK, or skip/don't load project.
I'd propose you add a 3rd option: Since this generally happens because you don't install older SDKs any longer but only newer, making projects essentially out of date, offer me the option to pick a new (greater) SDK Version among the ones I have installed. Currently you manually have to know to go into the project file to hand-edit this.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## vstest.console not support add attribute of xUnit to the trx file

some other need to analyze the trx file from the vstest.console combine with xUnite.console adapter. And when I add the [Trait("TestCategory","TestXunit")] to the test method, and the TestCategory attribute could no be added to the trx file. More information please refer to the following thread:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/e5f85cb7-e003-4207-a8f0-31a2bfd09e9a/testcategory-attributes-of-xunit-tests-do-not-end-up-in-trx-file-on-tfs-20152?forum=visualstudiogeneral

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Add auto check in to team foundation server in visual studio

Add auto check in to team foundation options server in visual studio to be chosen by the user as an option and with a check in interval. i.e Auto Check-in checked out files every 10 minutes or so, just like the auto save in office applications.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Make install faster.

Visual Studio Express used to install within a couple of minutes. Now, on a new faster computer I'm waiting for 30 minutes and I'm at about 50%. Download has ended 15 minutes ago and I keep waiting and waiting. :(

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## AGREGEN PARA HACER DIAGRAMA DE SECUENCIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa

AGREGEN PARA HACER DIAGRAMA DE SECUENCIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Validate Publish credentials before build process

When ready to publish a site from VS2017, its very frustrating if I wait for my build to occur and then it fails deployment because credentials are wrong, or the server is not responding, or firewall restrictions are in place.
Having to wait for a whole build to complete to then find out the publish will fail is a reversal of time efficiency. If it validates that it can publish, then builds, its saving me having to fix the publish issue (for me its often a VPN connection issue, or the password has changed) rather having to sit through two…

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Please add the 'Code Analysis' feature for the .NET Core projects

In VS 2015 or 2017, for the normal asp.net web application or class library, if you right click the project name, choose ‘Properties’, there is an option ‘Code Analysis’ on the properties page and we can configure it. But for the .NET Core projects like the ASP.NET Core web application, there is no such option on the properties page, please add it, this suggestion comes from here: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/6daba04d-b34b-4ab2-b4d9-fcef1b9d4794/code-analysis?forum=visualstudiogeneral

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Add a "Show disassembly" option in the editor

Right now, it is possible to see the code generated by the compiler in two ways: 1) by debugging it, which requires some way to get to the code at runtime, sometimes time-consuming for library code or 2) generating output files with mixed assembler and source code, which is somewhat hard to match to the original code sometimes. When optimizing some piece of code, it would be way easier if, after compilation, the "Show disassembly" option would be available directly in the editor. The optimize-compile-check assembler loop would be more effective that way. It would be even nicer if this…

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Two cursors in memory window

One in the raw bytes, one in the ascii. Only one has focus and accepts input, but they are synchronized so they always both point to the same memory byte(s). Would make it easier to correlate where ascii is in relation to the raw bytes.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Speed

Poprawcie prędkość pobierania i instalowania Visual Studio, jest okropna

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Include correct and reliable build steps for "hot" functionality.

I'm just trying to make a simple bot, not any more advanced than the "echo" sample using Azure functions. It seems like it uses every single unstable feature of visual studio. Every step (and there are a lot of steps) fails with undocumented and useless error message.

Like, right now there's a random blog post that hints that I need to install the "Azure Development" workload. Great -- how? The only reference I can find only is a silly cholatetely package.

Other issues:
- the command running **** doesn't work
- the messages.csx file has no intellisense or syntax coloring …

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Add XAML IntelliSense Filters

I would find it really useful if the IntelliSense suggestions for XAML were filterable like they are in C# and other languages. There should be a filter for all the properties of the object, and then another one for attachable properties. That way, when all you want to deal with is the properties for an object, you don't have to go scrolling through 1000 options just to find a specific one that you forgot the name of.

The pictures show what XAML IntelliSense looks like now, and what it should look like, as it does in C#.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Modify installation when an update is available

First time I installed VS 2017, I installed all components. Then, I wanted to remove some of them that I don't really need. But the installer had no "Modify" option, only an "Update" option as an update was available.
So, I had to spend aboud 30 min installing an update including components that I uninstalled just afterwards. It would have been much more efficient to be able to first remove the components, then install the update.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Allow debugging of projects whose assembly names differ by configuration

For historical reasons, some projects we develop produce differently-named assemblies depending on the configuration. This is achievable by manually editing the project file to include a new AssemblyName definition for certain configurations.

Visual Studio builds the project correctly for all configurations, and the assembly can be run stand-alone. However, if you attempt to start debugging the project in a configuration in which the assembly name has been overridden, Visual Studio gives the error:

> Visual Studio cannot start debugging because the debug target 'c:\path\to\correct\bin\dir\UnchangedAssemblyName.exe` is missing. Please build the project and retry, or set the OutputPath and AssemblyName properties appropriately…

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Keep "update" and "generate update script" buttons enabled in compare screen in database project.

In database project I wanted to generate update script after running "Compare". But "update" and "generate update script" buttons are disabled.
Keep buttons disabled without information why is a bad UX design. Better way would be to have buttons enabled, but when user clicked them, show detailed message why the operation couldn't be done.
Google gives multiple reasons why "update" and "generate script" buttons could be disabled, but the most often reason is the errors during the build( e.g see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17742638/update-target-button-is-disabled-after-schema-comparison?noredirect=1&lq=1)
Why some errors in the database project should prevent generating script? Why errors on objects which you've excluded…

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Make ik possible to copy git branch name

In the screen right below, you see the actual git branch where you working on. It would be handy to copy the branch name by right-clicking on it.