Visual Studio Team Services

We’d like your suggestions and ideas to help us continuously improve future releases of Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS) and Team Foundation Server (TFS), so we’ve partnered with UserVoice, a third-party service, to collect your feedback. Please do not send any novel or patentable ideas, copyrighted materials, samples or demos for which you do not want to grant a license to Microsoft.

This site is for feature suggestions; if you need to file a bug, you can visit our Developer Community website to get started.

Note: your use of the portal and your submission is subject to the UserVoice Terms of Service & Privacy Policy and license terms.

We look forward to hearing from you!
- The VSTS Team

How can we improve Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS)?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Add option to Enable/Disable Deployment inside Microsoft Test Manager (MTM) TestSettings as in the local TestSettings

    I need to run test inside MTM, and I need to add a TestSettings configuration to configure some options, but I need to disable deplyment as I need to run test in the build location.
    Using visual studio testsettings there is a check in the deplyment section to disable deployment, but inside MTM testsettings options there is no such option, there is only the possibility to add folders, not to disable deplyment

    556 votes
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)

      We’ll send you updates on this idea

      1 comment  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Support querying for "all test cases in a specifed test plan" a.k.a add work item links between test plans, test suites and test cases

      Since TFS 2013 Update 3 test plans and test suites are regular work items, but there are of no practical use in work item queries, as there are no links between them and test cases.

      With the links, I could create a query to list all test cases in a specified test plan. In Test hub or MTM I can export such list to email or print to PDF, but there is no way to get it in Excel format, which would I get for free if I could query.

      Currently, TFS supports the reverse, listing all test plans a…

      144 votes
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)

        We’ll send you updates on this idea

        15 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • Allow automated tests written in Nunit and Xunit to be associated to Test Cases

        Allow automated tests written in Nunit and Xunit to be associated to Test Cases. Currently only Automation written in Visual Studio Unit Test Framework / MStest can be associated to Test Cases. See Attached image.

        121 votes
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)

          We’ll send you updates on this idea

          17 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Add the ability to use the same shared step multiple times with different parameters in the same iteration

          At present you can use a shared step multiple times in the same iteration, however, you can only use it with the same parameter values.

          It would be extremely useful from a test case design perspective if you could use a shared step multiple times in the same iteration with different parameter values each time the shared step is used.

          106 votes
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)

            We’ll send you updates on this idea

            13 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

            As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

            Ewald Hofman

          • support parameters for radio buttons and checkboxes in MTM

            I can use parameters while creating action recording and playback for text fields and drop down elements. This does not work for check boxes or radio buttons (For example, if I create a parameter with value "Yes" and use that for a check box, the binding does not work)

            96 votes
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)

              We’ll send you updates on this idea

              9 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

              As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

              Ewald Hofman

            • Allow for query of the test case's outcome in TFS

              It would be great to be able to see the results of each individual test case in a list for a custom selection using the query tool inside TFS. Currently, in TFS 2015 you can only view the pass/fail status per test suite and not per test case.

              Please make the outcome field for the test cases available for queries based on the last outcome.

              86 votes
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)

                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                3 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • Allow MTM to record assertions

                QA can currently record actions that can be made into Coded UI tests.

                But they can't record "assertions".

                This seems odd because they are visually asserting already.

                The assertion dialog for MTM could be much simpler than in Visual Studio. 99% of all assertions come from the "Display Value" field. Just make that the only one that MTM uses.

                This allows the QA role to create much better actions that can then translate into Coded UI tests.

                82 votes
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                  1 comment  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • Add possibility to delete a Load Test from VSTS

                  I'm not able to find the button in the portal to delete a load test. My list is getting quite cluttered with Load Tests as I try them out a lot, and I would love to be able to delete them from the portal.

                  68 votes
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                    12 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • Offline test Execution: Allow users to execute test cases in an offline manner (when not connected to TFS)

                    Allow users to execute test cases in an offline manner (when not connected to TFS).

                    Steps:
                    1. Ability to export test cases & steps to Excel (when in office & connected to TFS)
                    2. Perform Test execution by marking tests/test steps pass/fail in the Excel file, while adding comments (when not in office & not connected to TFS)
                    3. Import test results from Excel into TFS (when in office & connected to TFS)

                    66 votes
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                      23 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                      We now have an extension (in Preview) on Marketplace for this scenario:

                      https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-devlabs.OfflineTestExecution

                      This currently works with Visual Studio Team Services & support for Team Foundation Server will be coming soon.

                      Please let us know your feedback about this extension.

                      We will wait for few weeks for feedback before marking this item as Completed.

                      Thanks
                      -Ravi Shanker

                    • enable changing the order of test cases on the web gui and let them be tested in this order for automated tests

                      To create an order for automated tests, Ordered tests have been the recommended way. However, users have requested automated tests to follow the same order as defined in MTM or the equivalent in Web (for non parallel 1 machine run). Opening this Uservoice item to see how many users would be interested in this functionality.

                      64 votes
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                        3 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      • Full Support for SpecFlow within Microsoft Test Manager

                        Currently integration seems limited with BDD style tools (SpecFlow) in particular. Can we have the ability to automate unit tests written in the BDD style so we can make the full use of Microsoft Test Manager.

                        We use Microsoft for the whole ALM stack and this is really the only bit that makes us truly automated.

                        Requirement would be to be able to associate specflow unit tests within MTM and be able to kick off runs against different browsers via use of Lab Manager or otherwise (like the current MS Test functionality does).

                        45 votes
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                          2 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        • Allow Shared Steps to be created within Shared Steps

                          Currently Shared Steps cannot be created within other Shared Steps as the Insert Shared Steps, Create Shared Steps, Open Shared Steps right-click menu options are grayed out.

                          41 votes
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                            8 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • Enable UI Map Hierarchy editing in Coded UI Test Editor

                            The Coded UI Test Editor introduce in Visual Studio Feature Pack 2 (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg269474.aspx) has great potential. Many times when recording control, the heirarchy created to represent nested control sometimes gets constructed incorrectly. For example, I may have nested UI structure like A->B->C->D and wish to interact with D. Many times the constructed UI Map will be lobotomized and only contain B->C->D or C->D when creating an interaction with D. What is odd about this is that Microsoft's UI Spy tool contained in the Windows SDK always gets the proper hierarchy. My suggestion is two-fold. Employ the UI Map…

                            38 votes
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              Signed in as (Sign out)

                              We’ll send you updates on this idea

                              2 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                              As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

                              Ewald Hofman

                            • Add option to stop QTAgent by the Test Agent if for example 5 minutes no test is run

                              If some test for some reason doesn't cleanup its playback(Playback.CleanUp()) the Test Agent which run the test becomes unusable until its restarted or QTAgent is killed. In Visual Studio 2010 there is an option "Keep test execution engine running between runs" it will be very useful if its possible to set this on the Test Agents or Test Controllers.

                              38 votes
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                Signed in as (Sign out)

                                We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                2 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

                                Ewald Hofman

                              • Multi-monitor support for MTM Video Recording

                                Currently it is very unpredictable which monitor will be recorded when using the video recording feature. It is very easy to record sensitive information such as the testers personal email.

                                By default it should only record the monitor that test runner is on but this should be configurable incase testers use a different monitor for the Application Under Test

                                Ideally it should be more obvious which monitor is being recorded. A slight red glow around the monitor in question when recording would be nice.

                                33 votes
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)

                                  We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                  5 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                  As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

                                  Ewald Hofman

                                • Allow adding sub suits to a requirement based suit.

                                  After adding a requirement based suit to the test plan tree, you can't add any sub suits.

                                  When you have many test cases, sometimes you want to split them into sub categories..

                                  Today you must do it using only regular suits, which force you to link the tests to the PBI manually.

                                  32 votes
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)

                                    We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                    3 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  • Allow creating unit test playlists that include entire classes instead of only individual test methods

                                    Right now the "unit test playlists" feature (added in VS2012.2) lets you create a list of individual tests (i.e. methods) to be run. However, we are adding new methods every day, which means the playlists would constantly need to be updated.

                                    It would be great if I could add an entire test class to a playlist, rather than only individual test methods.

                                    32 votes
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)

                                      We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                      2 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    • Support for SCVMM 2016 in TFS 2017 (Lab Management)

                                      Currently, we are limited to Windows Server 2012 R2 hyper-v hosts and SCVMM 2012 R2, which is the latest supported version with TFS 2017 Lab Management. We would like to see support for SCVMM 2016 in the next TFS updates. Thank you!

                                      31 votes
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)

                                        We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                        1 comment  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                      • auto generate bugs after a automation test run

                                        After my automation tests are run, I want any failed test case to automatically generate a bug report and place it on the specific person of my choise. I want this to be an easy option in test manager that could be configured in the test manager GUI. No coding required so my testers easy could configure it.
                                        And attachments should be possible to be added as well.

                                        30 votes
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)

                                          We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                          0 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                        • Choosing a new UIMap when you create a Coded UI Test from existing test recording

                                          It will be a better feature to choose a different UIMap when you create a coded UI test from an existing recording or Test and Lab manager. Currently, you have to edit the UIMap to move some code in another UIMap and it's not very funny !

                                          30 votes
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)

                                            We’ll send you updates on this idea

                                            2 comments  ·  Test  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                            As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

                                            Ewald Hofman

                                          ← Previous 1 3 4 5 17 18
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base