Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 11,267 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      under review  ·  499 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    • 3,665 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        50 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » Mobile App Development  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        Anonymous commented  · 

        I started delving into Xamarin development and I have to say I'm disappointed, though I guess it is understandable. What I'm expecting is to be able to have Xamarin at least support a subset of UWP rather than have to a similar yet totally different set of UI classes as it does now. Make UWP truly universal and not only would that support Windows growth, but it would be a browser-based-software killer as well. Not even the most ardent anti-Microsoft zealots would be able to justify absurdly complex yet primitive web development just so they can say their stuff is cross-platform.

        Anonymous supported this idea  · 
      • 33 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          1 comment  ·  Visual Studio IDE » Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          Anonymous shared this idea  · 

        Feedback and Knowledge Base