Markus Schaber

My feedback

  1. 6,174 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    112 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus Schaber supported this idea  · 
  2. 3,662 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    56 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » Mobile App Development  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus Schaber supported this idea  · 
  3. 11,267 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  515 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus Schaber commented  · 

    A good base for this could be Xamarin.Forms, which already supports the mobile platforms, and work is in progress to support the desktop platforms.

    For the web, see https://github.com/praeclarum/Ooui for one possible way to implement...

    Markus Schaber supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Visual Studio IDE » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus Schaber commented  · 

    In our use case, this wouldn’t work well.

    In our framework, we have two kinds of assemblies – plugins and others. For the plugins, all the dependencies (the other assemblies) are copied to the output directory via the appropriate setting at the project reference. Then we have a post-build step which installs the plugin with all dependencies in the target location.

    Now, when a non-plugin assembly changes, but the public API stays the same, the plugin is not rebuilt, thus the post build-step with the installation is not executed. We'd need some option to still execute the post build steps even if the compilation itself is skipped, but one of the dependencies changed.

  5. 1,514 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus Schaber commented  · 

    Java supports complete garbage collection of classes (at least most of the Desktop / Server VMs I ever used in production).

    Markus Schaber supported this idea  · 
  6. 67 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » .NET  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus Schaber commented  · 

    What about a workaround:

    Console.WriteLine("Result: {0}", result?"Success":"Fail");

  7. 252 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Visual Studio IDE » Languages - C#  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Markus Schaber supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base