BK

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK commented  · 

    Just one or two lines would be sufficient to convey the last activity.

    BK shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK commented  · 

    ***** YES *****
    Ability to Adjust Iterations Between Child and Parent
    If we define a higher level iteration, there is no way to move an existing iteration under the hierarchy to help support a hierarchy to support multiple iterations for a particular release or release candidate.

    BK supported this idea  · 
  3. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK shared this idea  · 
  5. 103 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK supported this idea  · 
  6. 104 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK supported this idea  · 
  7. 188 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK supported this idea  · 
  8. 202 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK commented  · 

    ********* YES **********
    I can envision a board displayed that shows real-time work, and a display (kiosk) feature to auto scroll to "action" if necessary to see activities on the project. Great idea!!

    BK supported this idea  · 
  9. 184 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

    Ewald Hofman

    BK supported this idea  · 
  10. 193 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK commented  · 

    *********** YES *************
    It would be outstanding if when the impediment tile hovered--the related/affected tile(s) would be highlighted. A virtual tie which would easily lend to understanding and quick discussion.

    BK supported this idea  · 
  11. 207 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK supported this idea  · 
  12. 323 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In our VSTS Feature Timeline(https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/vsts/release-notes/), you see a feature called “Dashboards – Create dashboard separate from a team” under “Reporting”

    This feature will allow you to create a Dashboard that has no association with the team. This means you don’t need to create a team, to make a Dashboard. You can create any number of these Dashboards and share them with who you want.

    However, Dashboards will still be stored with a Team Project. So to address your scenario (cross-team-project Dashboard), you’ll just have to pick a team project to store the dashboard.

    We don’t have immediate plans to store a dashboard outside a team project.

    BK commented  · 

    *********** NOTE **************
    This feature should enable "rollups" and "portfolio management" sort of capability. Elements that would allow a view across the projects to determine an enterprise roadmap of sorts. Also would help scheduling and reductions on dependency impacts or deconflicting. YES YES YES!!!

    BK supported this idea  · 
  13. 355 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK supported this idea  · 
  14. 375 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    As explained in this blog post (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2015/10/08/how-we-use-user-voice-to-make-a-better-product.aspx), we had updated the status of this suggestion to “Under Review” to let you know we are tracking it on our backlog. To better indicate which one we are actively working on or which ones are on our 6-month plan, we introduced the states “Started” and “Planned”. The goal is to give an update on in progress suggestions at least every 3 months. This suggestion is still on our backlog, but they are not part of the 6-month plan.

    Ewald Hofman

    BK supported this idea  · 
  15. 1,385 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK supported this idea  · 
  16. 766 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK commented  · 

    ***************************************
    YES!!
    ***************************************
    Calculated fields--even if implemented with language/syntax similar to SSRS reporting (which would lower the learning curve and possible shorted development time).

    Grouping is another wish!! Although, the tree capability is similar, multi-level grouping and aggregates in reporting would be amazingly useful! These aggregates could be used in very unique ways with tile widgets and charting.

    BK supported this idea  · 
  17. 893 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Enabling users to customer their column on the task board, has been an outstanding wish for us for a long time. A year ago we were planning to pick this one up, but unfortunately we were not able to get to it because of other priorities. We have kept the state of the user voice item as Planned for a long time, as it was always on the edge of being picked up.

    In our latest planning cycle, it is clear that it is still high on our list, but we won’t be able to get to it in the next 3-6 months. In a few months we will have our next planning cycle, and it will be again one of the features that we desperately want to deliver to you. I hope to have better news in a few months. Sorry.

    Ewald Hofman
    Program Manager

    BK supported this idea  · 
  18. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK commented  · 

    ************* MORE INFO **************
    *******************************************
    Further, there is not "easy" drill down to test runs. I have to use exotic method to clumsily drill down to test runs which become difficult to determine which runs belong to specific test cases. Seems like this would be an easy 1:Many drill down. We use the test runs to attach artifacts (aka "proof") that tests were performed. But it is extremely difficult to say for a set of requirements, which tests cases were ran, what the results were and then for specific runs, now prove it with artifacts...

    BK commented  · 

    From a compliance standpoint--the query capability does little to help us link a Task to a Test-Case with a list of Test-Runs... I don't understand why this wasn't made simpler. So I have to manually click through the Web-based UI to get this information and manually type or link using HyperLink because there is no link type of Test-Run

    BK supported this idea  · 
  19. 156 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK commented  · 

    ************* MORE INFO **************
    *******************************************
    Further, there is not "easy" drill down to test runs. I have to use exotic method to clumsily drill down to test runs which become difficult to determine which runs belong to specific test cases. Seems like this would be an easy 1:Many drill down. We use the test runs to attach artifacts (aka "proof") that tests were performed. But it is extremely difficult to say for a set of requirements, which tests cases were ran, what the results were and then for specific runs, now prove it with artifacts...

    BK supported this idea  · 
    BK commented  · 

    From a compliance standpoint--the query capability does little to help us link a Task to a Test-Case with a list of Test-Runs... I don't understand why this wasn't made simpler. So I have to manually click through the Web-based UI to get this information and manually type or link using HyperLink because there is no link type of Test-Run

  20. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    BK shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base